The Candidates and Women’s Issues
I’m not voting for Obama-Biden purely based on women’s issues. There are many ideological, economic, social, and political reasons that I feel Obama would be a better president. But when you look at where the candidates stand on women’s issues, there is such a stark difference that I don’t know how I could vote any other way.
I’m not going to go through every single relevant women’s issue in this post. The campaigns and media have made it clear how the presidential and vice-presidential candidates stand on such topics as abortion and contraception (Roe v. Wade specifically), violence against women, Title IX, and equal pay. But the topic of the candidates’ overall philosophy on women’s issues came up today, which I want to address.
I was sitting in my living room with my friends, one of whom was reading Cosmo magazine (which could be a whole other topic entirely). In it, much to her pleasure, was an article summarizing the candidates’ stances on the topics I listed above. After reading it, she asked me if all the statements were true (they were) and concluded that there must be more to it - that the magazine might be slanted in favor of Obama - because McCain couldn’t be as anti-woman as he appeared in the article.
The sad truth is that he is. His website features only a sad little section arguing to overturn Roe v. Wade under “Human Dignity and the Sanctity of Life,” with no other mention of women’s issues. Obama, on the other hand, has a highly extensive page, titled “Women,” which elaborates on an entire spectrum of topics, from preventing HIV/AIDS and fighting cancer to investing in women-owned small businesses, helping women veterans, and expanding early childhood education.
It is clear which candidate thinks women’s issues are important.
Link Blog: Connecticut Legalizes Same-Sex Marriages
Yay for our home state! See the AP article here and the full text of the decision here. Via Feministing and Shakesville.
Don’t Vote
Unless you care about anything.
See more funny videos and funny pictures at CollegeHumor.
And keep spreading the word - get your friends and family to register and vote - so it can become “rampant, like herpes, except for positive…”
Update: Alex and I have both sent in our absentee ballots, voting in a presidential election for the first time! While our votes for president aren’t as relevant in the solidly democratic Connecticut, we did vote No on the Constitutional Convention, which is only supported by groups in favor of banning gay marriage (which we have just finally won!) and abortion. See CT Vote No! for more information.
I’m Not a Feminist, But…
This is a phrase I’ve read about before. It’s the seemingly simple disclaimer that distances oneself from the label of feminist, while successfully othering self-proclaimed feminists. Once someone has said “I’m not a feminist, but…”, making it clear that the speaker very much does not want the label of feminist, not many people will want to come out and say proudly, “Well, I am a feminist!”?
I had never actually heard the phrase used until today. In class, we were discussing what makes a book a classic (ugh) and one woman related her experience of completely clicking with a book, and having that book become a classic to her. While I can’t remember the title, I know that her reason for liking it so much was that it really spoke to her experiences with gender inequality and how unfair life can be for women. And she said, “It’s not like I’m a hardcore feminist or anything, but…”
Now, it’s hard to blame someone for using this phrase, when I realize that many people are taught throughout their lives, whether by the media, their family, their peers, or who knows what other source, that “feminism” is a bad word, and that feminists are a bunch of radical, ugly, man-hating, bitchy lesbians. Having never had much experience with the word or the concept of feminism until college, I have been completely open to learning what feminism really means and becoming confident in calling myself a feminist.
I was a little shocked to hear “I’m not a feminist, but…” actually said to me, especially when she went on to describe her unfair treatment as the only daughter and the general inferiority of women to men in many aspects of our daily lives, which seems like a pretty feminist realization to me. She clearly agrees that women should have equality with men - the basic tenet of feminism - but still fears using the word itself. While the conversation went on to different topics rather quickly, while thinking about this throughout the day I have come to a decision. Whenever I hear “I’m not a feminist, but…” I will not be afraid - and will not hesitate - to say, “Well, I am!”
Link Blog: Let’s Talk About Choice
So sorry the posts have been light/non-existent lately. We started school again, and we’re still trying to organize our time. For now, I have a couple links. First, to yesterday’s opinion piece in the New York Times, “Let’s talk About Sex,” which criticizes abstinence-only programs and our fear of the topic, and encourages comprehensive sex education. And to Pro-Choice CT’s new blog, which should be a really open and welcoming forum for discussion on choice.
Women’s Equality Day
Today, August 26, 2008, is the 88th Anniversary of the passage of the Nineteenth Amendment to the United States Constitution, which gave women the right to vote. A little background:
“At the behest of Rep. Bella Abzug (D-NY), in 1971 the U.S. Congress designated August 26 as ‘Women’s Equality Day.’
The date was selected to commemorate the 1920 passage of the 19th Amendment to the Constitution, granting women the right to vote. This was the culmination of a massive, peaceful civil rights movement by women that had its formal beginnings in 1848 at the world’s first women’s rights convention, in Seneca Falls, New York. (NWHP)”
Let’s remember the many, many people who worked long before us for what we in America now take for granted: our right to vote.
Link Blog: Approval Ratings: The Public v. McCain
Wow. Check out this ad made by an Obama supporter on Youtube: YouTube - Approval Ratings: The Public v. McCain. I think it’s probably better than a lot of what Obama himself is producing. Via Waxy.
A few thoughts on return
It’s been a while! I went away to California last week with Alicia, my parents, and my brother, so neither of us have been able to post lately. I won’t do that without warning again! Anyway, I thought I’d record some of my thoughts on the two biggest pieces of news in the presidential race: Obama’s selection of Joe Biden and the upcoming Democratic National Convention.
Joe Biden
I think Barack made the right choice. To be honest, there were no perfect picks for the Vice Presidency in this cycle. Hillary would have been an unmitigated disaster, with her and Bill totally overshadowing Obama (as they seem to do even without being on the ticket). Obama does have a problem with experience that made an older, steady hand a necessary choice for running mate. And among foreign policy experts in the Democratic Party, Biden is probably the best for VP.
Good on the issues, a solid attack dog, only a few skeletons in his closet (the plagiarism scandal 20 years ago isn’t probably a huge deal, he’s well respected now). We just have to pray he doesn’t let out one of those infamous gaffes the cable news media has been going on about, because anything close to one will be an immediate headline.
The Democratic National Convention
I’m actually a bit worried about this, for two reasons. First, I think the expectations game is going to be lost no matter what. Obama got his start from the last Democratic convention, and we all expect a stemwinder speech. No matter what kind of bounce the Democrats get out of this, it won’t be quite as good as what it could have been.
Second, I think the hosting of Obama’s speech outside to a throng of 75,000 supporters in open stadium was a mistake. The spectacle feeds right into McCain’s recent criticisms of Obama as a “celebrity,” with the visuals and audio to match. I can’t help but be reminded of the Sheffield Rally of 1992 in the UK, a public spectacle which alienated voters through its outlandish and presumptuous display. The failure of that rally had a lot to do with Britain’s political culture, which frowns upon American-style rallies, but I fear that a 75,000 strong stadium rally for a presidential candidate might similarly be too far a departure from even the American tradition.
Link Blog: McCain and Obama use the same windmills
I swear I noticed this first. Obama and McCain’s Olympics TV ads feature the same stock footage. On the subject, I think both Olympics ads are subpar. Obama needs to tout his $1,000 rebate proposal more - it’s more of a vote-winner than “Fast-Track Alternative Fuels,” whatever that means. Meanwhile, McCain’s ad is too short on details to really be an effective hatchet job against Obama.